Evidence of extra-judicial confession may not be by itself sufficient

" There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any of the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din saw firstly the deceased and after some distance they saw the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not mean that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. Such evidence cannot be treated as evidence of last seen. Witnesses Ali Muhammad and Chand Khan do not figure in the F.I.R. Moreover, the evidence of extra-judicial confession may not be by itself sufficient for conviction of the petitioners. In respect of evidence of recovery, it was rightly argued by learned counsel for the petitioners that the same could be used, at the most, for corroboration of the main evidence, but by itself it cannot be basis for conviction."

" (1997 SCMR 1279)

Used In Judgment of
Lahore High Court
Crl. Misc.-Post-arrest Bail-Under Section 497 CR.P...
2103-B-19

Post a Comment

0 Comments

close