Both Complainant and PW admitted in their cross-examinations that the handwriting on complaint, Recovery Memo, rough site plan and the statements of witnesses recorded under section 161 Cr.P.C. was the same. The Investigating Officer, tried to save the situation by stating that the handwriting on these documents was different. On this, the Appellant’s counsel requested the trial court to examine these documents upon which it found that they were in the same hand.
0 Comments