“Only one fire-arm injury was attributed to Muhammad
Hussain petitioner but according to the post-mortem report
there was another injury on the person of deceased caused with
blunt weapon. Complainant party having not been able to
establish the charge against co-accused Muhammad Akmal and
Mst. Shafqat Perveen by any solid evidence, as such we are of
the view that petitioner should have been equally treated. The
manner of commission of incidence, on the face of record, does
not seem to be natural and probable”
2008 SCMR 345
Used In Judgment of:
Lahore High Court
Criminal Appeal
47-15
0 Comments