In this
regard, I am fortified by the dictum laid down in the case titled
”Muhammad Khan and another versus The State” reported as
1999 SCMR 1220, relevant para whereof reads as under:-
”It is axiomatic and universally recognized principle of law
that conviction must be founded on unimpeachable evidence
and certainty of guilt and hence any doubt that arises in the
prosecution case must be resolved in favour of the accused. It
is, therefore, imperative for the Court to examine and
consider all the relevant events preceding and leading to the
occurrence so as to arrive at a correct conclusion. Where the
evidence examined by the prosecution is found inherently
unreliable, improbable and against natural course of human
conduct, then the conclusion must be that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. It would be
unsafe to rely on the ocular evidence which has been
moulded, changed and improved step by step so as to fit in
with the other evidence on record. It is obvious that truth and
falsity of the prosecution case can only be judged when the
entire evidence and circumstances are scrutinized and
examined in its correct perspective.”
Part of Judgment
THE LAHORE HIGH COURT RAWALPINDI BENCH, RAWALPINDI
Criminal Appeal91-J-16
2017 LHC 4946

0 Comments