دفعہ 489 ایف (F) ت پ کیس، اگر چیک بزنس معاملات کے طور پر جاری کے طور پر جاری کیۓ جائیں، تو ملزم ضمانت قبل از گرفتاری کا حقدار ہو گا.
(2006 CrLJ 221)
اگر چیک بطورِ Security دیا گیا ہو تو ملزم کے خلاف 489F ت پ کا اطلاق نہ ہو گا. ملزم ضمانت قبل از گرفتاری کا حقدار ہو گا.
{2013 SCMR 51}
اگر چیک بزنس معاملات کے طور پر جاری کیا جائے، تو ملزم ضمانت کا حقدار ہو گا.
2009 PCrLJ 1418.
اگر چیک بطورِ سیکورٹی دیا گیا ہو، تو 489 ایف ت پ کا اطلاق نہ ہو گا. ضمانت منظور ہوئی.
2014 YLR 90
Cheque issued to self would seriously need consideration at a trial, Bail allowed.
2014 YLR 640.
*489-F PPC*
Section 497 CrpC
*BAIL GRANTED....*
2022 SCMR 737
2021 SCMR 1227
2021 SCMR 822
2021 SCMR 729
2021 SCMR 2090
PLD 2017 SC 733
2023 SCMR 1977
489 - F --- Constitution of Pakistan , Art . 185 ( 3 ) --- Dishonestly issuing a cheque --- Bail , grant of Further inquiry --- Admittedly , the petitioner ( accused ) was tenant of the complainant and prima facie any claim for recovery of rent falls within the domain of Rent Controller --- In this view of the matter , the question whether the cheque was issued towards repayment of loan or fulfillment of an section 489 - F , P.P.C. is a question , which would be resolved obligation within the meaning of by the Trial Court after recording of evidence --- Petitioner is behind the bars for the last about six months --- Maximum punishment provided under the statute for the offence under section 489 - F , P.P.C. is three years and the same does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497 , Cr.P.C .--
PLD 2021 SC 903
Denial of post-arrest bail in non-prohibitory offence in a case falling under one of the exceptions in Tariq Bashir case.
Offence under Section 489-F, PPC does not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497(1) CrPC and bail in such a matter is a rule and refusal an exception. The grounds for the case to fall within the exceptions meriting denial of bail include (a) the likelihood of the petitioner’s abscondence to escape trial; (b) his tampering with the prosecution evidence or influencing the prosecution witnesses to obstruct the course of justice; or (c) his repeating the offence keeping in view his previous criminal record or the desperate manner in which he has prima facie acted in the commission of offence alleged. The prosecution has to show if the case of the petitioner falls within any of these exceptions on the basis of the material on the record.
0 Comments