Two conflicting judgments to operate, creating confusion.

Indian Supreme Court, while highlighting the importance of judicial discipline in the case of “Dr. Vijay Laxmi Sadho Vs. Jagdish” (2001 (2) SCC 247) observed:-

It is well-settled that if a Bench of coordinate jurisdiction disagrees with another Bench of coordinate jurisdiction whether on the basis of "different arguments" or otherwise, on a question of law, it is appropriate that the matter be referred to a larger Bench for resolution of the issue rather than to leave two conflicting judgments to operate, creating confusion. It is not proper to sacrifice certainty of law. Judicial decorum, no less than legal propriety forms the basis of judicial procedure and it must be respected at all costs." [Emphasis added]

Used in Judgement of
Lahore High court
WP- Criminal Proceeding
9027-17
2018 LHC 1465

Post a Comment

0 Comments

close