12. The PIL movement took it’s flight in Pakistan with the
case Benazir Bhutto v. Federation of Pakistan and another (PLD
1988 SC 416) when a Larger Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court
unanimously held that the rule of “locus standi” and “aggrieved
person” can be relaxed whenever a question of public importance
arises with reference to enforcement of fundamental rights. The apex
Court went further and added that fundamental rights include not only
the rights enumerated in Chapter 1 of Part II of the Constitution but
also those envisaged by Article 2A and the Principles of Policy in
Chapter II of Part II. It said:
“While construing Article 184(3), the interpretative approach
should not be ceremonious observance of the rules or usages of
interpretation, but regard should be had to the object and the
purpose for which this Article is enacted, that is, this interpretative
approach must receive inspiration from the triad of provisions
which saturate and invigorate the entire Constitution, namely, the
Objectives Resolution (Article 2A), the Fundamental Rights and
the Directive Principles of State policy so as to achieve democracy,
tolerance, equality and social justice according to Islam.”
Part Of Judgment
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition-Criminal Proceedings-Detention/habeas
409-20
2020 LHC 200

0 Comments