The testimonies of both the
eyewitnesses, being chance witnesses, cannot be accepted without a
pinch of salt. In this regard we respectfully refer the case law reported
as Mst.Sughra Begum and another v. Qaiser Pervez and others (2015
SCMR 1142) wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court of Pakistan has laid
down the following dictum:-
“14. A chance witness, in legal parlance is the one who claims
that he was present on the crime spot at the fateful time, albeit, his
presence there was a sheer chance as in the ordinary course of
business, place of residence and normal course of events, he was
not supposed to be present on the spot but at a place where he
resides, carries on business or runs day to day life affairs. It is in
this context that the testimony of chance witness, ordinarily, is not
accepted unless justifiable reasons are shown to establish his
presence at the crime scene at the relevant time. In normal course, the presumption under the law would operate about his absence
from the crime spot. True that in rare cases, the testimony of
chance witness may be relied upon, provided some convicting
explanations appealing to prudent mind for his presence on the
crime spot are put forth, when the occurrence took place
otherwise, his testimony would fall within the category of suspect
evidence and cannot be accepted without a pinch of salt.”
Part of Judgment
THE LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE
Murder Reference642-10
2015 LHC 7528
0 Comments