-Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, S. 5(2)--Complainant stated before the court that he has affected compromise with the petitioner and has no objection on confirmation of ad-interim pre-arrest bail-

 PLJ 2022 Cr.C. 321

Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)--

----S. 498--Pakistan Penal Code, (XLV of 1860), Ss. 161/467/468/471--Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, S. 5(2)--Complainant stated before the court that he has affected compromise with the petitioner and has no objection on confirmation of ad-interim pre-arrest bail--Pre-arrest bail is allowed.          [P. 322] A

Mr. Abdul Rehman Zauq, Advocate vice counsel with Petitioner.

Madam Asmat Parveen, Deputy District Public Prosecutor for State with Syed Kausar Hussain Shah Circle Officer ACE Multan.

Hafiz Muhammad Abu Bakar Ansari, Advocate for Complainant.

Date of hearing: 7.7.2021.

 PLJ 2022 Cr.C. 321
[Lahore High Court, Multan Bench]
Present: Safdar Saleem Shahid, J.
REHAN-UD-DIN--Petitioner
versus
STATE etc.--Respondents
Crl. Misc. No. 2931-B of 2021, decided on 7.7.2021.

Order

Through this petition, Rehan ud Din petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in case arising out of F.I.R. No. 13/2020, dated 19.09.2020 registered under Sections 467,468,471/161, PPC read with Section 5(2) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, at Police Station ACE District Multan.

2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Muhammad Ramzan complainant of this case has effected compromise with petitioner.

3. Muhammad Ramzan (complainant), present in Court, submits that he has effected compromise with the petitioner and has no objection on confirmation of ad-interim pre-arrest bail already granted to him. He has also submitted an affidavit in this regard which has been placed on record of instant petition as 'Mark-A'. He has also produced 'Iqrarnama' entered into between the parties which has also been placed on record of instant petition as 'Mark-B' comprising two pages.

4. Learned Deputy District Public Prosecutor has not vehemently opposed this petition.

5. Arguments heard. Record perused.

6. It has been noticed that Muhammad Ramzan (complainant) of the case has categorically stated before this Court that he has effected compromise, with the petitioner and has no objection on confirmation of ad-interim pre-arrest bail already granted to him. In view' of the fact that complainant of this case has effected compromise with the petitioner, instant petition filed by the petitioner for pre-arrest bail is allowed and ad-interim pre-arrest bail already granted to Rehan-ud-Din (petitioner) is confirmed subject to his furnishing fresh bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 100,000/- (Rupees one lac only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court.

(K.Q.B.)          Bail allowed