Rao GHULAM MUSTAFA vs State
Involvement of huge amount did not enlarge the punitive scope of S. 489-F, P.P.C., and there was no ground for refusal of bail-
2020 PCгLJ 1445
LAHORE
SOHAIL ALAM vs State
Punishment under S. 489-F, P.P.C. is three years, or fine or with both irrespective of the big amount and said punishment does not fall within the ambit of prohibition contained in S. 497, Cr.P.C..
2020 YLRN 22
LAHORE
MUHAMMAD SHABBIR vs State
S. 489-F--Liberty of accused, who is otherwise found entitled to the concession of bail, cannot be curtailed on the ground of the charge being of heavy amount ---Maximum sentence which can be executed upon the accused remains to be three years, if the case is proved---Case under S. 489-F, P.P.C. does not fall within the prohibitory clause of S.497(2), Cr.P.C.
2019 PCLJ 872
LAHORE
MUHAMMAD TARIQ vs State
S.489-F--Concession of bail was a procedural relief having nothing to do with the final decision of the trial---If a person, otherwise, was found entitled to the concession of bail, his liberty could not be curtailed on the ground of the charge being of heavy amount.
2018 PCLJ 469
LAHORE
ANWAR MASOOD KHAN vs State
S. 489-F--Concession of bail was a procedural relief having nothing to do with the ultimate fate of trial---If a person, otherwise was found entitled to concession of bail, his liberty could not be curtailed on the ground of charge being of heavy amount.

0 Comments